Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SE
Sethayy @lemmy.ml
Posts 0
Comments 7
What is something that sounds 100% true but is actually 100% false?
  • Tbh Id argue the opposite on the nitpickyness, as on a bike you feel forces - kinda obviously. The space example only is used (although yes uncommon) because it has minimal forces.

    Supprisingly enough if you have forces applying to you, you are an object under force (and such wont be going a constant speed - woah who knew), and so the original comment would not apply

    Long story short quit trying to call them out to sound smart, you're just making an idiot out of yourself

  • It's possible to bathe a newborn kitten with fleas?
  • Then again almost everything has a 1% of killing anything, the world's pretty dangerous. So - with a vets opnion - bathing a kitten to remove discomfornt isnt all bad news.

    Great example is im sure many kittens have died eating before, but of course we still feed them

  • [db0] Reddit is a dead site running
  • Wasnt the point of the article that the tech literate people left? For sure the hardest crowd to please, but Id say they've settled here in Lemmy with the massive ammounts of tools and apps being created - with such a small userbase

  • What is something that sounds 100% true but is actually 100% false?
  • Oh my I really overestimated your standpoint there, your argument is simply the existence of eletrostatic forces? Cause I can gaurentee the original comment takes that into consideration, under the term 'forces' - highschool or not such is true until the limits of Newtonian mechanics.

    Simplified, if something has no forces acting on it, it also has no electrostatic resistance (aka friction), and will follow newtons 2nd law - remain at rest or in motion, as the original comment stated.

    I thought you were debating why the comment didnt take quantum effects into consideration lol

  • What is something that sounds 100% true but is actually 100% false?
  • Statistical approximations are a large part of complex systems, such as the summation of billions of forces of atoms.

    Id argue given the insane ammount of moving parts, a simplication as easy to understand as Newtonian mechanics is extremely accurate, at least compared to the limited input data

  • What is something that sounds 100% true but is actually 100% false?
  • Ngl saying it isnt pushed vs isnt acted on by a force are entirely difference scenarios, a push is a subset of forces (as im sure you know with your uni courses right ;)

    Else newtons laws would be incorrect on a macro scale, which to say at the least would be... concerning