Here's where you're wrong: The most vaccinated population is the elderly. Therefore, if mRNA were effective, there would be a decrease in the age distribution of initial death rates in the most vaccinated population over the age of 65, compared to the younger population who were vaccinated to a lesser extent. People have been vaccinated and failed without any data showing that vaccines work. If only they had worked, we wouldn't be talking about this.

I wonder why people defend mRNA liquids without questioning. It turns out that just mRNA or anything else can't do anything against the coronavirus. Before the phase stages were completed, without any data, everyone claimed with one voice that these liquids would work, and billions of people were vaccinated at an unprecedented speed and failed. Why do we criticize straw man conspiracy theorists instead of questioning why our taxes are diverted to useless liquids and transfer wealth? Simply put, in the table where cases and deaths are announced every day, governments could announce the vaccinated/unvaccinated ratio in cases and deaths, this would be more prudent than excluding people and pumping propaganda in echo chambers. Or do they have an explanation for why the death rates in countries that do not use mRNA liquids are less than Covid deaths in Europe and the USA? Hint: Even if the elderly are vaccinated, they continue to die from Covid.

While the daily number of cases and deaths are announced every day, why did the governments not disclose the vaccinated/unvaccinated rates in the number of cases and deaths, so that we could understand the difference (if any) ?