This Wiki-page is mostly about the brain, not the rest of the body. But you are right that there is a close relation between body and brain. Following article explains some dependencies. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/brx2.43
Also, monkeys are forced to get the last coconuts off the trees. Animals basically used as slaves.
Not unclear as a whistle.
Yeah sure, they'll probably also have typed all posts on Lemmy, including those that have not been posted yet.
What if the monkeys evolve to higher intelligence as time passes by?
They only be a statistical footnote that almost nobody will notice.
Good point. Same goes for fake news. Let's address the fear and anger on both sides first, only then we can get some facts in.
No way that government will have a majority to make this happen anytime soon. Interesting idea though.
The number of subscriptions has gone down by 10% already. That's what happens when billionaires interfere with media, apparently.
For one: generalised statements are only about you when you fit the description, you be the judge of that. Second: I did not say what you can or cannot do, only that the tag 'agressive' is on the wrong group of people. You calling me an entitled hypocrite is not so nice, especially as you don't know me at all. Ironic? Yes, from time to time. I could guess your reaction from a mile away.
Not that expensive at all. I'd say the meat-eaters are the ones being agressieve, killing and mistreating all those innocent animals, heating up the atmosphere and minimizing nature as they go. All to pleasure their taste buds.
They just think they're all such good cyclists, and therefore never have an accident. Weird.
Puffballs not to be mistaken for earthballs, which are poisonous. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scleroderma_citrinum
It's just the creation of particles with an ultra-short lifespan, which then decay into other particles. Only there are more of this type than expected, but still within the tolerance of what the theory predicts. Additional tests are needed to say anything conclusive. That's just what they normally like to do at CERN, they're quite good at it. They also started the world wide web, back in the day.
Additional comment against nuclear: water cooling, which is a real problem in a warming climate. Rivers will dry up or flood. And near the coast with rising sea levels is also difficult, using salt water. Besides, there are plenty of sustainable alternatives with a cheaper price tag, so why bother?
Nah, even the wikipage shows double the price compared to solar or wind. Which isn't surprising when you look at the basic technology of each energy type. And they all have to deal with a lot of bureaucracy.