such as the key jailbreaking method right now being an appeal to empathy

Honestly the most optimistic thing that's come out of this. A potential AGI singularity is still terrifying to me...but this does take the edge off a bit.

18/20 because after that you ought to be able to be a candy-giver. This whole thing only works if we have enough candy-givers, and too late of a cutoff age skews the balance.

Maybe people won't pay money for it. Maybe they will. The problem isn't that people may or may not pay money--it's that you've placed your sense of worth in monetary value.

Read some existentialism, no joke. I don't agree 100% but I read a bunch of Beuvoir over the weekend and one thing I did like was it made me internalize the idea that coming up with a project I care about and achieving it is worthwhile in and of itself regardless of if it "could" be done by someone/something else.

Think about it this way, there are mathematicians from 500 years ago who did a lot of stuff by hand for hours that I could work out with a calculator in seconds today. But does that mean all their work was worthless? If I create a fairly shitty drawing, but I'm proud of my having created it, am I wrong to be proud simply because my friend who is a great artist could make a better one in half the time?

It's not just about the journey, but it's not just about the destination either--its about the journey to the destination, and placing value only in one of those things will cause you to be at a loss for the rest of your life.

Counterpoint, I'm doing my best.

Only web dev at my company and a fresh college graduate.

It me.

As a full stack cloud dev usually for me it ends up being some lag between when Azure claims a thing was updated and when it actually was.

(shout out to azure B2C custom policies for taking like 10 minutes to actually reflect changes despite giving me a lil green checkmark)

For easy indexing. Lots of influential literary works have this. There's a universal standard indexing for both the works of Plato and Shakespeare, for example.

Why do you assume there is one?

Very good post. Very true post.

Mozilla fucking rocks, dude.

Just decent quality content for various topics which aren't politics or tech. For the good of increasing the size of Lemmy, I think everyone ought to find a couple things they're interested in as hobbies and just dare to make content about them.

Lots of niche communities have the problem where no one posts because no one posts. At some point, you have to just pull the ripcord and start the darn thing, even if it takes a while.

Right now it's H.S. (Hot Shit) by Tom Cardy

Why would I say something about your restating my comment? Was there something additional you were attempting to express there?

But go on, get hammered, get laid. Maybe you will die of liver cirrhosis.

I drink about a glass of wine every couple weeks at most.

I think I'm going to continue "raping" people then.

Do you believe these are the words of a socially stable individual who respects consent?

Thanks for demonstrating I was correct. Although I really do wish I wasn't. I really do hope you take the time to make the world a safer by recognizing how dangerous your mindset is—if not for others than at least for yourself. I'm not sure how you learned that this was a good way to be, but I'm sure it's hurting you more than you realize.

Getting this raving mad at a few people on the internet just for saying you shouldn't rape people is just supporting my conclusion.

"I'm not unsafe to be around!" proceeds to demonstrate extreme emotional instability and an inability to engage with others without completely melting down

If you find drawing a single conclusion from evidence to be indistinguishable from magic, then you've done more to insult yourself than I ever could.

Actually, it makes sense now that you don't see a power imbalance between yourself and drunk people, because it seems like you need people to be drunk for the floor of their intelligence to drop below the ceiling of yours.

Why do you think that? I do not see any connection between my comment and you conclusion here.

No. It quite literally means that you also cannot be discriminated against for that. In fact, the protections that make it illegal to discriminate against LGBTQ+ individuals are the exact same protections that prevent discrimination because of your being straight, and if you were to repeal the former, the latter would be lost as well.

You have it, quite literally, entirely backwards.