Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JO
JoGooD @kbin.social
Posts 0
Comments 11
rule
  • Haven't made that claim sorry. I haven't been clear enough. There's an obvious trend to remove the word woman from books to be replace with people with such organs. Doesn't make gender disphoria false.

  • rule
  • But what kind of people put so much energy into trying to show person A that it is indeed the case? Person A may be an asshole to refuse the evidence, but person B could also be selfish to take a lot of energy into convincing person A of something that might not be apparent or even might not even reflect reality. It doesn't mean that one is more right than the other or being disrespectful. Truth hurts after all. But then, if someone keep repeating the truth, maybe that person becomes an asshole. Or maybe we should ask this person if it is indeed an asshole to not misslabel them an asshole and hurt its feeling.

  • rule
  • Gender is something assigned at birth, it is not a social construct. Doctors and parents may misgender , it is true because sex generally reflect the gender of the person but it isn't always the case.

  • rule
  • With whom are you arguing? Who is the right? Did the right say anything about gender and sex being a different thing? Why are you assuming that some kind of people thinks differently on that matter?

    This has nothing to do with the right. If you want to argue with people, you should do so instead of posting and pretending that someone made a claim. I know it is something a lot of people do online but I think it doesn't really help making sens of things and it mostly serve the purpose to divide from each other by picturing some kind of boogeyman out of a group of people.

  • rule
  • Printed books in universities are scams. They print new versions of book that is the same as it was, sometimes they just change the order and then teachers mention you need that very version to be able to follow the course but it really is the same book in a different order. So of course if there is a popular movement that advocates replacing the word woman for a meaningless terms they will jump on the occasion to print new books. Then when people realise that this gender affirmation doesn't (for most of them) make them any happier or actually make them worse, it will be another great opportunity to print another version of their books.

    Here's a documentary about the gender affirmation made ~10 years ago. I think there is 6 parts to it. It is also available on Youtube but I recommend using Invidious

    Brainwash documentary

  • to vi or not to vi
  • I hate nano. I wish people just used vim instead. I mean it is the same without the keybind displayed. Vim should be like nano by default. The base vim config are bad anyway, so why not add this little help guide?

  • These millionaires want to tax the rich, and they're lobbying working-class voters
  • What would that change? Why not tax them 100%? Guess who's paying the bill? Us. Taxing the rich won't change anything. If you want some people to have less money, then you should try to not give them money. I'm not saying it is easy but that's how its done. Then they can always get you by taxing you to pay for their stuff. Taxes are never for the rich, its a trick.