Would this same ruling have happened if Trump wasn’t involved? No, I don’t think so.
Stop the steal overthrow.
The devolution will not be televised.
Absolutely fucking terrifying what they are advertising and how it’s not being cared about. In addition to the lies and other shit, of course.
Says the book banner.
Trump attacks the military. He denigratesthe Justice Department and judges. He belittles the FBI and the CIA. He picks fights with allies and cozies up to dictators.
Trump is an unserious carnival barker running for the most serious job in the world. During his last term, Trump served himself and not the American people.
These are the kinds of articles we need from our media, and also needed sooner. Much sooner.
That’s actually a pretty nifty idea. Too bad we live in a privacy nightmare and can’t trust others.
Perhaps this would be a good use for other connected devices like smart power meters.
As others have said, it’s too varied.
In no small part because alcohol is a drug.
I had some good shit typed out about addiction and booze (two posts in a row!), but then I mostly-read the article and see that he wants to get rid of a ruling which overturned a law making narcotics illegal (assuming the story didn’t just use that word).
So I’m now wondering if he would hold onto that until big pharma is off the hook for their role in the opiate epidemic.
I think that’s probably for the best, because macrodosing on alcohol as a society isn’t fixing anything.
Ok, that was too deep maybe. No, I’m not on mushrooms. But I am a believer in psychedelics having positives.
Reminds me of this:
I would also like to point out the humour in me finding that on 9gag with some other watermark.
Hope you go broke. Chicken-shit yellow cowards.
It’s not a phobia if it’s a real threat, you bag of smashed assholes.
So let it train on Windows source and keep your mouth shut when someone uses it to mimic Windows but better.
