The exact terms of birthright citizenship are laid out in the 8 U.S.C. § 1401; the way that this is interpreted is up to courts.

According to US statute, if Barack Obama had been born outside of the US (he was born in Hawai'i) to his American mother while she was not married to his Kenyan father (...and they were married at the time he was born) , he still would have been a natural born citizen according to 8 U.S.C. § 1409.c, because she was both a citizen and had resided in the US for at least one year.

Rights are rarely absolute, or nearly as cut and dry as people claim. For instance, the freedom of the press has been interpreted to not include material that is obscene. Freedom of peaceable assembly requires that you pay a fee and get a permit. The right to keep and bear arms has been determined to not include things like buying surface-to-air missiles from Victor Bout. Up until Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), despite the 6th amendment saying that you have the right to "have the Assistance of Counsel for [your] defence [sic]", indigent suspects were not provided with an attorney (...and what use is and enumerated right if you lack the ability to exercise the right?). Under fairly recent court rulings, you must explicitly invoke your 5th amendment right to remain silent; simply being silent is insufficient.

Do I think that Trump is going to be able to revoke the citizenship of people that were born here to undocumented immigrants? No. Do I want him to? Also no. Do I want to see his mass deportations blow up in his face and implode the economy? Oh yeah, definitely. I want people--Trump MAGAts--to see just how much we rely on the underpaid labor of the undocumented people in this country for the necessities of life.

Again - I don't believe that's correct. It a pregnant woman went into labor prematurely while vacationing in the US, and had a baby here, I don't believe that child would be a US citizen.

IIRC, birthright citizenship isn't quite as cut and dried as it seems. My ex-spouse worked in a passport office, and there are some weird rules about things like how many years you have to have lived in the US depending on exactly where you were born and to which parents. I don't remember all of them, but it's not quite as cut-and-dried as "you're a US citizen if you were born in the US"; you also have to be subject to US jurisdiction. So if you're born in the US, but are raised entirely outside of the US, IIRC you might not be a citizen.

Just want to point out the irony that the same people saying that Jordan Neely was not a threat are quite often in the same camp of people saying that it's fair game to shoot men that say, "you body, my choice" because that's a credible threat of sexual violence.

They do, and you don't need to be a member to use their pharmacy. You also don't need to be a member to see the optician that they usually have there, and in at least some states, if they sell liquor, you don't need to be a member to buy liquor.

Oh, I wouldn't use them to buy medication. I'm just using them to check the retail prices.

I know that their Costco prices aren't correct though; if you're a member and paying out of pocket, Costco will enroll you in a prescription savings plan.

$800 out of pocket for a three month supply

My brother in Christ, where the FUCK are you buying your testosterone that it's $270/mo. without insurance? When I look on GoodRX right now, the average price for a 10ml vial of 200mg/ml testosterone cypionate is about $50. Assuming that you need about 200mg EW, that's a 2.5 month supply right there. Even if you follow the recommended guidelines and discard the unused contents of the vial at the end of every month and buy a new vial, that's $150 for a full three months.

Plus it will alienate more people on the immigration issue

Immigration was the 2nd most important issue to voters, after direct economic issues (e.g., how well they felt they were doing economically). Without seeing what mass deportations will actually do to the economy and country as a whole, the majority of people that voted this year are in favor of the shit the GOP has promised to do.

the USA needs is real solutions

There isn't one, not really. Certainly nothing that can be done in a mere four years, and probably not in sixteen. The countries that people are coming from are largely desperately poor, and struggling with gang violence. The way to 'solve' the immigration issue is to correct the problems in their own countries so that they don't feel like making the journey to the US is a necessary for their survival. We can have some degree of effect on the gang violence by cutting the demand for the drugs in the US that fuel the gang violence in central and south American countries. But we can't do much of anything directly. We can dump money into the issue, but then you have the problem of people in the US screaming about how we should be helping people in the US before doing any kind of foreign aid (spoiler: we wouldn't be helping people in the US anyways).

How can it be fixed top-down when it’s all cops?

The serious answer is that you need to have outside control over the process. Cops need to be accountable to someone other than themselves. Civilian review boards are a good first step, but you need to make sure that the civilian review boards have real teeth, and that they don't get captured by the police (e.g., the people on the review board all being family members of cops). Note that police unions and officers have long opposed civilian oversight boards, because that removes part of their power.

You also need to ensure that prosecution is always handled by an independent agency. A local DA will need to continue to work with police, so it's against their interest--and hopefully also in the public interest--to create a hostile environment where the police think that the DA is 'against' them.

You also need a way to limit the power of the police union. A police union does serve a real purpose, in that it should insulate cops from acting as directly political agents. OTOH, it also protects the worst cops out there, and makes it nearly impossible to quickly get rid of someone that's clearly unfit for public service of any kind. I don't know how to do the latter without also undercutting protections against the former.

The problem is that pardoning undocumented immigrants won't have any real effect. Yes, crossing the border illegally is a crime, but is the equivalent of a misdemeanor; in other circumstances, it would likely result in a fine and no jail time. But even if they're all pardoned, that doesn't give them legal status in the US. There's likely not a lot that Biden can do to give them the status that they would need. And even if he could, there wouldn't be much to stop Trump from revoking it.

Simply being undocumented is not a crime.

It is, but it's a misdemeanor. It's not terribly serious, all things considered.

It... Depends. There are ways of having a productive discourse. But it's slow, and it doesn't work well online.

The fundamental reason that people say ACAB is because the people that are trying to do good things still enable the shitty ones. That is, they fail to act when they see shitty cops; the 'good' cops don't police the bad cops, and that makes them, in turn, bad cops themselves, because it allows bad behavior to be normalized. The relatively few cops that won't go along to get along quickly find themselves left high and dry; the get the worst duties, don't get backup in a timely manner when they need it, don't get promoted or end up being demoted, rack up a long list of bullshit infraction of departmental rules, and so on, until they get forced out.

People talk about reforming the system from within, but it's a top-down problem, and the police unions are either directly involved or, at the absolute minimum, are complicit by working to protect cops that the union knows are corrupt.

If it was La Guardia airport, then yeah, built in the 70s and no major upgrades since then is about right.

how she even got the gun through security.

You can quite legally transport a firearm in your checked baggage, because it's not accessible to you during the flight.

But yes, the TSA is a joke, and red teams have roughly a 90% success rate at getting firearms and simulated bombs through "secure" checkpoints. It's security theater; it catches people that aren't really trying very hard--or truly forgot that they weren't supposed to carry a firearm in their carry-on bag--and it makes the majority of people think that flying is completely safe. Not very long after 11 September, I was flying to New York City with a friend that accidentally had a rather large switchblade in her carry-on, at a time when switchblades were illegal throughout the US. Not only did she carry it to NYC, she was able to get it back to Chicago, all without the TSA noticing.

Heretic. In theaters, I think opening weekend.

It was, BTW, absolutely fantastic. They absolutely nailed Mormon doctrine and dogma, as well as the practices of missionaries. I highly recommend it.

Never had one. If you get tested prior to each new partner, and require the same from them, it's remarkably easy to avoid, as long as you don't participate in hook-up culture.

We know that cops can break encryption on your phone

Depends on the phone. Cops have not managed to break the latest iPhone encryption yet, and I believe that some of the more recent Android is also currently unbroken. Regardless - if you don't use a smartphone for doing questionable shit, there's nothing to break. This is why burner handsets exist.

get everything from your social media account

Not if you don't have one. And even if you do--a smart assassin isn't going to post anything that's remotely close to linking your real life to committing a murder.

track your payment methods for your ebike get away

Not if you steal it. Which is reportedly what happened. An even easier trick is to buy a used bicycle with cash off at your destination; you've already spent $1000 on a pistol with a threaded barrel, and about $2000 on the printer to print a silencer (because you sure as fuck aren't buying a Dead Air Sandman and getting on an ATF list, right?, the printed silencer won't last long, but it doesn't have to), so what's another $500 for a used bike, and $200 for a good lock and chain so that it doesn't get ripped off while you're whacking a CEO?

Pro-tip: .45ACP is always subsonic, although a silencer will never make a gunshot silent by any stretch of the imagination. Best case scenario for anything other than .22LR is that it's going to be quiet enough that you won't destroy your hearing if you pop off a shot in a small room.

to the CVS you bought your prepaid card with cash at

...Which is 500 miles from where you live.

they can use gait identification to ID you

Easy to fool just by putting a rock in a shoe. Also an exceptionally questionable (e.g. psuedoscience) method of identification, much like bite analysis.

use thermal vision drones to find you in some field.

First, they have to know who and where you are in order to even be searching for you in that field. Second, thermal is not nearly as useful as you'd think. A piece of carboard, a mylar blanket, even a sheet of glass will entirely block it. It's not even going to be able to see through moderately heavy brush or tree cover.

I'll buck the trend here.

Yes, I want him prosecuted. I want every single piece of evidence the cops have put out in public, and I want the public to see exactly how they traced him and caught him. I want people to see just how insidious the surveillance state is, and I want them to understand what kind of lengths they'll need to go to in order to avoid getting caught the next time.

Hey, I'm against condoms. They suck, and don't feel very good for anyone. That's why I got sterilized, and when I was dating I got tested regularly and insisted on the same from my partner(s).