Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GB
Grizzly_Biscuit @lemmy.world
Posts 0
Comments 21
change my mind
  • I agree, everyone who doesn't like all of star wars is a big dumb idiot. Only smart guys like us can appreciate. I mean "somehow" Palpatine literally did return. Heh. Dummies.

  • Why are the mods here removing any comments critical of Hamas?
  • Wait to criticize Hamas is supporting terrorism? Can you tie that in somehow for me? I'm not a supporter of how the IDF is dealing with things because of all the civilian casualties in gaza, but I don't have to support Hamas to have that opinion.

  • I'm not asking to be rich.
  • "Money doesn't buy happiness" was first coined when people could afford a house with an average income. We're starving and that one time our grandparents over-ate at a buffet is being shoved down our throats.

  • Judging from the level of complaints, air travel is getting worse
  • I do, not monthly but enough to say that my own anecdotal experience would agree with yours and this article's perspective. That doesn't stop me from taking a jokingly objective stance. First comment I made was just the reverse angle of the same data set.

  • Judging from the level of complaints, air travel is getting worse
  • I mean with the way the data is presented it definitely is agreeable that the rise in complaints is directly tied to the quality/performance of the flight industry.

    But, on principle alone I refuse to openly accept correlation as a causation for two data sets, and always leave room for expansion and more dots to connect. Without that in play, it's easy to convince anyone that all spurious correlations have a cause/effect relationship.

  • *Permanently Deleted*
  • Oh...to be honest I think I read the prompt backwards. As a rule of thumb, anecdotes should always be taken with a grain of salt when presented with contradictory empirical evidence.