Skip Navigation
Gordon_F Gordon_F @lemmy.ml
Posts 4
Comments 6

Why using a censorship platform when fighting for freedom & privacy ?

To the developer working on SimpleX,

Why are you still using Microsoft Github ? (and by extend Reddit ! )

  • https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/do-githubs-updated-terms-of-service-conflict-with-copyleft
  • https://www.jessesquires.com/blog/2022/04/19/github-suspending-russian-accounts/
  • https://bitsvsbytes.com/blog/move-github-gitlab/
  • https://www.reddit.com/r/github/comments/8p27ud/why_are_developers_moving_their_code_from_github/
  • https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/22

I had myself a question for the maintainers. I was planning to use the discussions and to do so, create an account :'( But it seem that Microsoft really doesn't like Tor: \ !

Cheers.

12

is Tor planned to be embedded ?

Hi,

Does anyone, know if SimpleX plan to embed Tor ? ( To not need to install Orbot )

Thanks.

1
Could SimpleX be P2P ?
  • I couldn't have said it better !

  • How Google helped destroy adoption of RSS feeds
  • They did the same with Flash with the help of adobe.

  • Could SimpleX be P2P ?

    Hi,

    I've just tested SimpleX. Great piece of software, all the options are really well thought ...

    Sadly it's not P2P (all the messages pass by servers... ) is there a way to make-it P2P ?

    Thanks.

    6
    Privacy minded ` instant messaging ` quest.
  • A little update.

    I've just tested simplex on Android.

    it's very well thought out ! The features make sense. UNFORTUNATELY it's not P2P ! all the messages pass by their servers :'( with Briar it's P2P.... weirdly they claim their way is better than P2P ! any comment on that ?

    In my point of view, if messages are stored somewhere it's mean the can be process[^1] !

    Cheers.

    edit: lemmy link to their community [email protected]

    [^1]: Copied, analyzed, cracked (Brut force or what ever)

  • Privacy minded ` instant messaging ` quest.
  • jami’s good but it uses turn server to verify your name

    So is it secure ? does that mean you rely on those server to be able to created an account ?

  • Privacy minded ` instant messaging ` quest.
  • I think your mistaken... Can someone confirm ?

    So I was eager to test Jami, but on Windows it require Windows 10.. so no way --> https://itvision.altervista.org/why-windows-10-sucks.html

    anyway I gave a quick try on a test machine (win10) But I got , not matter what I entered

    Too bad because it had on paper, a lot of nice features..

    On linux, too bad they don't provide (yet) an AppImage...

  • Privacy minded ` instant messaging ` quest.
  • no ! thanks ! look promising too.

    I'll try it and give my review... but is it require to make a "jami" account on their server !??

  • Privacy minded instant messaging quest.

    Hi,

    I'm looking for an instant messaging ( IM ) apps software/protocol that run on Android and computer

    and meet the following requirements :

    • Open source !
    • E2EE
    • Messages are send in direct ! (not passing by a server)
    • handle group
    • Truly private ! ( That's the tricky part )

     

    The closest that I've found is Briar

    • \+can work without internet ! (bluetooth, local wifi, files !)
    • \+ use TOR
    • \- Mutual party have to exchange key (or your can introduce someone)
    • \- sending media suck for now, poor image quality
    • \- no call or voice messaging

     

    I've been looking for alternatives:

    • Session
      • Sadly it keep ALL the conversation into server !!! so it's a no go.
    • speek
      • I didn't try it yet, any feedback ?
    • simplex
      • it look very promising ! (didn't tried it yet)
      • \+ seem to handle multiple profile in one !
      • \+ do not require that both party send an invitation !
      • ! I didn't found (yet) if the messages are send in direct or pass by a server.. \ It's not P2P all the messages pass by servers.. too bad.

    All post about alternatives or experience with the one that I cited are welcome.

    24