There are some in Luxemburg also, which the source doesn't seem to know about. I.e. the data seems very outdated, or somewhat random.
Not even considering how wrong price gouging is, is the tweet a bad rephrase of something mc Donald's announced?
Based on the tweet alone:
Mc Donald's said: "Wage raises cause price increases. But not all price increases are caused by wage raises".
Everyone heard: "If there's a price increase, it can only be due to wage increases"
I'm all for boycotting mc Donald's, but if we're going to call them out, let's call them out on something that can't be rebutted with basic reading comprehension skills.
Now, let the downvotes begin!
They don't just hit each other. A few years ago, I was riding my bike (as in bicycle, not motorbike). A bat hit me head-on. Right on the, err, gentleman's sausage.
I'm still waiting for super powers to appear.
The way you phrased it is not quite what the study says.
They're not "25% likely of not divorcing" (which would mean there's a 75% chance of divorce).
They're "25% less likely of divorcing"
Because you'd be constantly changing your volume up and down slightly while scrolling.