this makes me wonder how much longer a towel could be used if it were promptly dried after use, rather than put up on a hook where some of it dries sorta and the rest of it clumps.
even when you are clean from showering, you are still covered in delicious skin, refreshing moisture, and things that thrive in the presence of both.
How many times in U.S. History have the 3rd or 4th options been elected to the office of President? When the answer is zero, how do you count them as options?
You are literally more likely to win the lottery than you are to elect a third party to U.S. President.
speculation: they don't enjoy their lives, but they do enjoy feelings of purpose and belonging. joining a cult offers more of the latter two, less of the first.
plausible: check
testable: TBD
falsifiable: TBD
still, 1 out of 3. not bad!
prices will be raised regardless. record profits? raise prices. record growth? raise prices. cost of production goes down? raise prices.
if you won't deny a thing to someone it's pretty hard to sell it to anyone
can we put the extra 30 hours on the end of each year as a formless blob of 'time off'?
nah hold on it has to be
day/quarter/week/year
/s
This is such a common phenomenon that it has a name: cognitive dissonance. If you already knew what that was, then your comment suggests another example of it.
Relay or decrentralize it maybe.
The thing I read about this earlier said Signal is super against decentralization iirc. Or at least against federation? Are they different?
For those that supposedly champion capitalism, this should be a win win in demonstrating what the market does when you are no longer competitive.
Yes, absolutely. Unfortunately it's quite traditional only to tolerate markets as long as we're happy with their behavior. The moment a market starts worrying or upsetting us is never "oh man, maybe this 'markets' thing isn't all it's cracked up to be", it's "obviously some regulation or policy is ruining this market, or it would never do this thing i don't like".
So we're stuck with the lose-lose-lose of:
-
keeping markets, their volatility, and all the shit that comes with that
-
giving up the fringe benefit of markets redistributing wealth when they collapse
-
denying anyone a chance to see clearly what it means to trust markets to manage our economy for us.
Could you give some details? Maybe an invite link? I can only seem to find expired links to any EV Nova discord that google turns up.
that's not the point. the point is that there are people who can't afford to save money in the long run. not like metaphorically can't afford, like literally mathematically cannot afford.
they are trapped by their existing financial burdens which they already cannot meet and which are getting larger every month thanks to compound interest.
inflation, which normally has the effect of reducing the value of debts over time, is instead making their financial burdens effectively larger too. as inflation drives up the cost of living, wages stay the same and they have ever less of their income available to make debt payments as a result.
That idiot straight up said that no exceptions were acceptable for abortion
Being pro-choice it so happens I also believe no exceptions are acceptable.
Hey, I'm fully on board with your defense of social media, but I think in this case the commenter is just saying "i miss the social media we had before they started calling it 'social media'". Even 2004 facebook fits this description, and I'm inclined to agree. I miss social media when it felt more like IRC and craigslist, when facebook was a glorified personal guestbook, etc.