Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DZ
DzikiMarian @lemmy.sdf.org
Posts 0
Comments 23
Wow, what a comp for doing free consulting work ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Because if he's able to help anyone on SO, he very likely profited many, many times from free access to knowledge there before he got to this point. Given activity of average user he probably gained orders of magnitude more than he given.

    I find rambling about money and compensation in such context distasteful.

    SO provided platform which, while not perfect is used by millions of people. They aren't overloaded with ads and dark patterns as many of the clones. If it's worthless, why people are using it instead self hosted blogs for example?

  • What's some really unpopular opinion you have?
  • Right now my life is significantly better than someone who decides to live on government welfare.

    30 something years ago, when we had socialism in my country it didn't matter if you worked, got drunk or slept at work. Everybody had the same shitty flat and the same shitty products (assuming there were products at all).

    This system has a lot of problems, but socialism sucked indefinitely more.

  • It's so nice to see them all growing, but this is just the truth, sorry.
  • In general I strongly prefer open source, because lots of propertiary software will try to vendor lock you and then extract money from you, when it's hard to escape for you.

    In this case however I can change back to Connect or other any second, so amount of control this program has is extremely minimal and experience in exchange is better.

    Informed choice is better than picking and following dogma, because dogma doesn't work in some cases.

  • What is a technology/gadget you refuse to use and why?
  • I don't believe in ethical companies. Microsoft was cool once, then Google was cool, now some people seem to think that Apple is cool.

    Best way to not get burnt is not to get vendor locked with one of them. Android allows me to install Firefox(real one, not Safari re-skin), replace launcher or even entire OS with Graphene. Google sucks in many ways, but if I'm not happy with them I just install software from another vendor. With ios I have to throw away half of the hardware I own.

  • What is a technology/gadget you refuse to use and why?
  • I never wrote they are objectively inferior. I even admitted they can be marginally better in some areas. My point is they'll vendor lock the hell out of you and the trade off isn't worth it.

    Meanwhile you wrote two walls of text to defend company that uses your children and technology worse than ICQ (released in 1996) to make you buy their products. You're free to do so, but I'm not sure which one of us is salty :-)

  • What is a technology/gadget you refuse to use and why?
  • Leaked emails indicate, they use iMessage to actively lock down users in their walled garden. This is area with literally zero innovation (or even regression) for past decade. At least.

    Giving money to Apple basically equals to strangling innovation in exchange for getting (sometimes or even rarely) marginally better UX in boring, well explored areas.

    Also once you are bought into their ecosystem you are stuck with some mediocre products like iPhone, because if you want alternative, you have to throw away watch, tv and speakers and then redo entire home automation due to lack of elementary interoperability.