Yeah, for me it was Alex Jones presenting this idea that the world elites had a plan to depopulate the world, saying that he had a solution, but then leaving that as a cliffhanger for his next video. I was left thinking, "wait, this seems more urgent than 'wait for my next video', if that's really happening, it should be a 'we gotta stop this now'".
And then I thought about the high production value of his videos. They were professional level, which would take a budget. Someone threatening such powerful enemies wouldn't have a budget, they'd have problems created by those enemies (because I never ended up in that "our enemies are simultaneously strong and weak" mindset). I didn't realize at the time how profitable his schemes were and that he could easily pay for professional-level feature-length videos, but by the time I understood that, I saw his grift for what it was.
Lol I remember being frustrated by the normies that kept dismissing it, but getting caught up in the denial shit from within sounds even more frustrating.
It baffled me for a while until I realized that some people take it as a reduction of them to that body part. Like "the only useful part of you is your cunt/dick".
I always saw it as more of a metaphor, dicks fuck things up, assholes make things shitty, cunts are fucked (and each of those are metaphors since I don't think there's anything wrong with literally fucking or being fucked as long as everyone involved is good with it).
Though I still don't understand why people give others the kind of power over them where they can upset them with their choice of words, before the meaning of their message even comes into play.
As someone who went down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole in the 00s but realized Alex Jones was full of shit by 2010, I was incredibly baffled to see the movement align behind someone who could be an avatar of everything it feared.
That said, the racism and bigotry in that movement had gone right over my head and I generally dismissed the more out there shit like lizard people or aliens being involved because it sounded stupid. I believed (and still do) that that shit is part of a real strategy to use ridiculous claims to generate noise that makes real things like MK ultra more likely to be dismissed along with them.
I'm baffled as to how anyone other than asshole bosses saw him as anything other than another asshole boss. The Apprentice gave me a strong negative opinion of him, similarly to how Shark Tank gave me a strong negative opinion of Kevin O'Leary.
Kinda like that undercover boss show where they tried to show how great these CEOs are by throwing some money at specific employees that are struggling, ignoring that better leadership and compensation that lines up better with the value being created would improve things for all of the other struggling employees that weren't lucky enough to be assigned to boss babysitting duty (assuming the whole thing wasn't staged entirely).
Yeah, iirc, at first they tried to downplay the change, then they paused it, then they walked it back entirely. I think that last step happened relatively recently, even.
But IMO the damage was done from just trying to alter the deal like that.
And, for me personally, I (naively) thought that ARM was an open standard. I opposed the Nvidia purchase because I thought they would do their corporate bullshit to kill off competition or for greed and thought that it getting blocked meant it would be free of corporate bullshit. This action makes it clear that it's already got some of that going on and ARM has been mentally re-filed to a spot beside x86 and its derivatives.
Though now I'm wondering if that's the whole point. Do some shitty corporate stuff so that the next time someone wants to buy them out, there isn't as much opposition and the current owners and C-suite can cash out.
Probably by the very armies and security forces they hired to protect them from that in the first place, once they realize that the rest of society collapsing means there probably won't be consequences for forcibly inheriting their employer's estate.
Or maybe it will be whoever holds the keys to the safety system they built when they realised they'd be at the mercy of their security forces.
On the bright side, food safety laws are set to protect people with weaker immune systems. That one person that died was older, so if you're younger and healthy, you probably don't have anything to worry about beyond maybe a more vigorous and fluid shit session or three, at least with e coli.
That's also something to be aware of if you frequently ignore or stretch food safety rules at home. Just because you haven't died from it doesn't mean grandma or junior will be able to handle it the same. Or that guests that haven't spent however long building up that immunity won't have issues. It might also explain mysteries gut issues that keep coming up.
I wasn't flying through space, I was traveling through space, officer, so I don't need a space flying license!
Becomes a top player just to advise others to stay the fuck away from the game.
This seems like a tactic that might win a battle but lose the war. Reminds me of Unity.
Yeah, though on the bright side, it's not nearly as bad here as Reddit was. Based on votes and replies, it seemed like a non-trivial amount of people on there didn't have much skill in the reading comprehension or persuasion department.
If I get downvotes without any reply, I generally assume I've angered some trogdolytes, similar to getting replies full of vitriol.
Which has helped with my own urges to rage reply.
I suggest the personal firmware update of stopping caring about downvotes. Then they just become interesting data points.
This gives me similar vibes to Unity's pricing change: a sign that it's time to stop relying on ARM if you have the flexibility to do so, unless you're big enough to push back (which Qualcomm probably is). A tactical move with horrible optics.
Yeah, it was a good talk. Funny watching the sentiment of the voters throughout, too.
Yeah, it is hard to say if the "glorified text predictor" is completely accurate, since the sheer size of the model allows for some pretty deep connections.
And, thinking about it since making that post, it's hard to say for sure that even Einstein or Newton were doing anything differently or were just the first/most famous to put those particular things together.
I don't mean it needs to be the exact question, just something with equivalence. If someone talked about stacking boards and other things, the board could go on the bottom and then maybe someone else talked about stacking balls and books that way, so it used that because "eggs" were associated with "round". Follow up with the nail thing from another conversation.
It's definitely a form of intelligence, but I don't think it's anywhere close to 99.9% of human thought. I think it's missing entire dimensions of thought.