they are still free to speak, but that community is no longer going to give them a platform
you can personally object, but all I hear is this
when you are an anarchist, you will get to tell exactly one anarchist what their praxis should be
so you can see by pushing back on advocacy for the ruling hegemony, they are being anarchists
I only vote for criminals. fuck the law
they do care who wins. they want to be the ones to win
it's no law at all. it couldn't have been proven, and it can't be disproven either. it's a tautology.
duverger is an undisprovable tautology. it is not a law
the libertarian party punches way above the greens. you're simply wrong.
you speaking about it as though people who would vote for a conservative only have one issue: Conservative candidate. but it's a whole platform, and it's also diverse in its Interests
tell people that didn’t vote “you don’t vote, you don’t have a right to bitch”
I don't believe in rights at all but I'll say anything I like
game theory assumes rational actors. it does not determine human behavior
values voting is the solution. it's plain as day that the reason party consolidation happens is strategic voting. a refusal to compromise preserves a diversity of parties.
I'm not a bad guy.
harm reduction has a specific meaning. voting is not harm reduction.
the video learned the wrong lesson. party consolidation is the result of strategic voting. values voting is the solution.
