Skip Navigation

poilieve tells Trudeau to "butt out" of New Brunswick's policy on lgbtq students

www.cbc.ca /news/politics/poilievre-new-brunswick-lgbtq-students-1.6889770
29
29 comments
  • Stepping into the issue slightly, it becomes interesting. Ignoring the trans element, for now.

    There's an interested debate here about parent's rights to choose how to parent. Now we as a civilization have decided that there are red lines that parents cannot cross. An extreme example: parents cannot beat their children as punishment. And there's a lot of not-quite-illegal things the government does a lot of education around, like drinking during pregnancy, in order to improve the quality of parenting and the quality of life for children. So government intervention in parenting is already, largely established -- at least when it comes to certain topics.

    The government, however, does not intervene as parents take their kids to "Sunday School" and indoctrinate them (oops, my own experiences and biases are showing). And generally, parents are allowed full control over their children's lives unless they cross that red line. Few parents exhibit full control, micromanaging every aspect of their child's life, but they probably could and be in the clear, legally -- at least when the child is in their physical proximity.

    Abstractly: schools, and specifically public schools, are not parents. They have to follow a set of rules set by society at large. And largely, aside from educating the students, they serve as a means to prepare students to become functioning members of that same society. This means that schools need to enforce some sort of public normalization on the students -- the exact form of which should reflect the society the students will enter, more or less. Optimally, they're preparing students for a society that will exist in the future, not the one that exists today, or one that existed in the past, but it's hard sometimes to know what that future will look like. You take some best guesses about this future society.

    So now we have the conflict between the individual and the society. A parent yields some control when sending their kid to a public school, in the hopes that they will become a productive member of society. And this debate is about exactly how much control is yielded. And this debate is in many ways a core debate for our whole country - one of which can encompass residential schools, multiculturalism, religion, and more. Sometimes the guesses made about future society are off the mark, and what is intended to be a policy for good turns into a policy that was retrospectively harmful. We won't know until the future arrives.

    But then the discussion gets completely overwhelmed by transphobic dogwhistling, and the resulting backlash, hiding the core of it.

  • Members of Higg's cabinet have resigned. In their resignation letters they say they reigned because he's an authoritarian.

    This is liberals or leftists saying this. This is lifelong conservative saying he's an authoritarian.

    All my life there have been trans people. Trans people have been around for a long time. They aren't anything new.

    What is new is this panic over trans people. At least it's the first time I've seen it in my lifetime.

    Where is this panic over trans people coming from? We see it in NB. We see it in Florida. We see it in Russia.

    Wait why are they passing anti-trans laws in Russia? Don't they have bigger problems?

    The problem they're trying to solve isn't the trans people. They need to tighten their control over people. What's the easiest way to control people? Make them hate.

    Hateful people are easier to control. So focused on their perceived enemy they can't think about anything else.

    But to make people hate you need a target for that hate. What is the most convenient target? Trans people. A groups so small, most people don't know any of them. So aren't as likely to stick up for them. Besides that, people changing gender is confusing. It makes people uncomfortable. Makes them feel icky. Makes them feel like they want it to go away somehow.

    Trans people are the canary in the coal mine. Because the bastards always go after them first. Because they're the easiest target. But the monster down in that mine doesn't just eat canaries. It eats everyone.

    So why is it for the first time in my life I'm seeing this panic over trans people? Because authoritarians are running a play out of a play book. And while it's the first time in my life I'm seeing this happen, it's not the first time it's happened in history. Trans people have been around a long time. They were around in Germany in the 1930s. Until they weren't. And the monster that killed the trans people didn't stop there. It just kept on killing.

    We shouldn't have any illusions about what's happening.

    "The cultural marxists are promoting deviancy to weaken Western Civilization"

    "The Jews are promoting deviancy to weaken the Aryan Race"

    Same shit different century. And a lot of these bastards aren't even bothering with code words like "cultural marxist" or "western civilization".

    Blaine Higgs is an authoritarian running a play right out of the fascist play book. These bastards always go after the trans people first.

    My Grandfather was a New Brunswicker. Fought in a brutal war against the axact kind of shit Blaine Higgs is about. Higgs is disgracing my grandfather. He's a disgrace to all of us.

  • Someone should tell Blaine Higgs to butt out of the lives of queer students.

  • Wait why are they passing anti-trans laws in Russia? Don’t they have bigger problems?

    You hit the nail on the head here, albeit obliquely. Authoritarian governments around the world are banging the anti-gay/anti-trans drum because they have bigger problems, and they desperately need their voters' eyes off those bigger problems. It's easy to loot the piggy bank when people aren't looking.

    We've had a really good run, especially if you're rich, but it's coming to an end, and the economy is breaking down on the poor first because the rich know it's coming to an end and they're panicking. They had almost twenty uniterrupted years of cheap money and neoliberal non-interference but the bill is coming due and we have a generation of wealthy folk who cannot imagine not making wheelbarrows of cash every minute. So they're putting in the squeeze on the rest of us: tax cuts, service cuts, price increases--you name it, it's on the table.

    Poor people are noticing this, and they're starting to get upset, especially when COVID kind of tore the veil away. The last thing the rich want is a left-wing government to get in and renegotiate the social contract, so they're hoping to keep the current state humming along by blaming economic issues on social policy. LGBTQ issues are a great one for this: LGBTQ people make enough fascist-curious and vulnerable voters uncomfortable enough that they're safe to dogwhistle (we can't say "Jews" just yet).

    What will be the acid test is how companies respond: for the last decade, the rainbow dollar has been worth more than the Nazi dollar, and it's important we keep the economic pressure up. Voting is great, but it only happens every four years or so, but you buy stuff every day, and the companies that actually whisper in the ears of the government pay attention when people stop buying their stuff.

    So yes, by all means, punch a Nazi when you see one, but also make sure you let the businesspeople who are potentially Nazi-curious because the Nazis are promising tax cuts know that the Nazi dollar is toxic.

    You might laugh, but German industrialists were full-throated in their support of Naziism in the 1920s because they saw it as a useful way to increase their wealth, bust trade unionism and suppress Marxism. Naziism didn't start with the gas chambers, it started with things that looked the the Convoy, especially the "backed by business" part. So yeah, boycott companies and burn their social equity when they kowtow to right-wing harassment, and give your explicit support to organizations that are Allies. Make sure that the momentum we all spent decades building doesn't get rolled back.

    Side note: something that is going to make this harder is that we've lost a lot of platforms in the last five years: Twitter is now a Nazi bar, Facebook...was never great, Reddit is coming unglued and media consolidation has favoured the right-wing (TorStar sold to a conservative a while back, and is looking to merge with PostMedia). I really hope people wake up and realize we're actually really close to getting kicked back to 1970 in terms of what kind of a voice we have.

  • I've always found it interesting that these raging debates about gender & sexuality in students seem to completely ignore the actual students in question, as if they don't matter at all.

    Conservatives appear to view their kids as property more than they do people, and anything they do outside of parental control is effectively "property damage". Children probably need some guiderails to account for their developing minds, but the limits there probably shouldn't be used to prop up hate speech and abuse.

  • Wow this thread devolved into hate speech pretty fast

29 comments