You're viewing part of a thread.
Never said I was doing any different. Can't discuss things in a reasonable manner, then you're going to get talked to like an asshole. Real simple. I don't give a shit about argument rules. But take Solace in the fact that there's a block button and you don't have to see what I say if you don't want to
- OK, point to where Hongdao said that Lemmygrad "has a chance to communicate with the IRA"
- I never said that you were wrong because of the fallacious reasoning, I just said that you have failed to make a point. Me calling out your logical fallacies are just statements of fact
- Your fallacious reasioning is not fallacious because of some "argument rules". It is fallacious because there is an inherent hole in your reasoning. I am not the one breaking good-faith here. You are.
No. I just have zero concern in giving a point. Come to your own conclusion. And I want to focus on the word malicious. People talk to me maliciously and I'm supposed to not only accept it, I'm supposed to continue to maintain a dialogue? Nope. fuck those people.
"people talk to me maliciously" When have I ever "talked to you maliciously"?
What makes you think I'm talking about you?
The fact that you are unabashedly using logical fallacies against me
You're right because you deemed it necessary to give a one word statement "strawman". I responded in kind. Do you see where I'm going to with this? I'm not going to treat like an ass with every sentence, but if you do something that I perceive as disrespectful, I will respond that way. Do you see how the dialog truly took off after the fact?