Progressive Politics @lemmy.world TokenBoomer @lemmy.world 1w ago

Duty to Warn Letter - to VP Harris - Re: Election 2024

Discover and discuss great writing with the world’s smartest readers on Substack.

**You should reverse your concession, call for both a full investigation of criminal activity and demand hand recounts in all seven swing states. **

In my professional view there are multiple and extremely clear indications the Presidential vote was willfully compromised.

Pleasant Politics @slrpnk.net SerotoninSwells @lemmy.world 1w ago

Duty to Warn Letter

substack.com /home/post/p-151721941

4 5

You're viewing a single thread.

17 comments

If this is so probable, why can't I find any news source about this anywhere online other than here? Seems a little odd for someone to suggest the Election systems in swing states were compromises, and its only reported on this very obscure website.
- Yeah, if there was anything to it they'd have their lawyers all over this. The result more or less matches the polling, and except for a few small incidents here and there, there were no issues.
- Because the Dem leadership and the billionaire-owned media are too invested in the institutions of democracy to defend democracy itself by pointing out that those institutions broke under pressure from hostile actors that they treated as legitimate.
  
  Also, they're probably worried that their reasonable inquiries based on actual reality will be equated with the fraudulent "stop the steal" AstroTurf campaign.
  
  Doubt it, if there are credible claims of systemic access and manipulation of vote totals, people would be all over that shit. That's not the same as claiming the vote was stolen, and then presenting zero evidence.
  
  Doubt it, if there are credible claims of systemic access and manipulation of vote totals, people would be all over that shit
  
  Yeah, that's what they said about all of Trump's crimes too, but here we are..
  
  That's not the same as claiming the vote was stolen, and then presenting zero evidence.
  
  I know. What I'm saying is that they're using the risk of people impervious to evidence as lack of same accusing them as one of many excuses to not admit that the system they hold as more sacred than any ideal is broken and that they did a crappy job defending democracy.
- Here is another news source.
  
  And another
  
  Second link doesn't say anything close to what you're claiming it says.
  
  You wanted alternate news sources about election fraud in the general. Here’s an entire subreddit dedicated to it.
  
  I’m not entirely convinced it is true, but the possibility that Trump and Musk would subvert the election wouldn’t surprise me.
  
  Found another.
  
  No, i wanted to see this specific thing you posted reported elsewhere. But, it's not.

17 comments