The most recent #update for #Mastodon has reached three fourth of the followers from @heiseonline, patching the #preview-bug for them. So we should see most of the traffic coming from here again. Yet,
The most recent #update for #Mastodon has reached three fourth of the followers from @heiseonline, patching the #preview-bug for them. So we should see most of the traffic coming from here again. Yet,
The most recent #update for #Mastodon has reached three fourth of the followers from @[email protected], patching the #preview-bug for them. So we should see most of the traffic coming from here again. Yet, the number of visits from the #Fediverse to heise.de hasn't really grown that much.
At least, the three #Twitter-alternatives are again bigger than #X, which keeps declining.
In sum, the four networks deliver half as much traffic than #Twitter alone in the beginning of 2022.
#Threads #Bluesky
@[email protected] @[email protected]
But obviosly Mastodon (really Mastodon or all Fediverse? ) is the most important Alternative to X.
It's traffic via the links, our account on #Mastodon is posting. So it's mainly #Mastodon, but there is some #Fediverse in there.
See also here: https://social.heise.de/@mho/111455995811886384
@[email protected] ich liebe Graphen . Finde ich dennoch weiterhin beeindruckend, das heißt im Grunde ja: Eure Zielgruppe ist hier zu finden. @[email protected]
@[email protected] @[email protected] Interesting stats. What is your take on why the portion of Threads and Bluesky is so small, compared to Mastodon?
On #Bluesky @[email protected] has just a tenth of the followers from here, that's certainly a big reason. On #Threads it is much more, but as far as I know, we can't (or don't) publish automatically (meaning all articles), so there is way less content to click on.
It's not my responsibility, but I'll ask the colleagues, when I see them the next time…