How come Israel don't use Mossad to take out all of the Hamas leadership similar to what they did after Munich? Would this not be better than bombing stuff into oblivion?
How come Israel don't use Mossad to take out all of the Hamas leadership similar to what they did after Munich? Would this not be better than bombing stuff into oblivion?
You're viewing part of a thread.
So funny story. I've gone to every link you've provided to me and none of them were a UN study.
Also a funny story, one link I provided you had multiple IPC reports. So that tells me you aren't reading my links, and that your claim of "one FRC report" is laughable.
In the same lane, you also obviously didn't click though to the news article I provided in the last comment. Or you wouldn't have said something so demonstrably false about Gazan aid being turned around. Also, again, if you're going to comment in so many places, re-read the thread real quick to make sure you haven't forgotten something important. Like the fact that I mentioned that in the last 3 comments. It's not in fact something new.
Finally, accusing UNRWA of incompetence while blocking and attacking their aid convoys has been an Israeli propaganda line for most of the past ~10 months. The fact you've gone in on that twice now is enough for me to just leave this here. You're not here in good faith.
I've gone to every link you've provided to me and none of them were a UN study.
Because you won’t read past the abstract. I can only give you the sources; I can’t make you read them.
Also a funny story, one link I provided you had multiple IPC reports.
You didn’t provide a link.
t. Or you wouldn't have said something so demonstrably false about Gazan aid being turned around.
It’s not a news story about aid being turned around in Gaza. It’s a news story about aid being turned around at the Gazan border because it contains impermissible dual-use items that are forbidden in aid shipments to Gaza.
Finally, accusing UNRWA of incompetence while blocking and attacking their aid convoys has been an Israeli propaganda line for most of the past ~10 months.
You’re correct that it’s propaganda but you’ve misattributed it. It’s Hamas propaganda.
If the paper says something the abstract doesn't then it's a bad paper or a bad abstract.
I absolutely provided a link, it's even labeled, "IPC Report Link".
And no. The news article is very clear these checkpoints are inside Gaza, not at the border. Which again is there for you and everyone else to read.
And lmao you think Hamas is what? Paying the UN to say they've been attacked by Israel? You know what don't answer that. I'm not sure why I even replied to this post since it's very obvious your only angle here is to deny all evidence of Israel's crimes. No matter how damning.
If the paper says something the abstract doesn't then it's a bad paper or a bad abstract.
The whole point of an abstract is that it’s not the entire paper, stupid
It's a summation, science isn't into clickbait.
I continue to recommend that you read the paper past the abstract, hope that helps
I continue to live in hope you will realize victim blaming the people you blow up isn't an argument.
Does war exist, in your view? Or is it always a case of the winner murdering the loser, unjustifiably?
There is a large difference between war and genocide. The last group to say you couldn't have a war without genocide was the Serbians.
There is a large difference between war and genocide.
But that’s what I’m asking you. Can one side achieve overwhelming victory, in your view, without you calling it a “genocide”?
No, right?