Woman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AI
Woman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AI
Suzi Dougherty’s photograph of 18-year-old Caspar deemed ‘suspicious’ by judges, even though it was taken on her mobile
Old news - she was taking Omega 3 capsules. Omega 3 comes from fish oil, and helps your brain develop, thus enhancing your intelligence and possibly making you more 'arty'.
The competition refuses to accept photos enhanced by arty fish-oil intelligence.
Take my upvote and get outta here
This is a red hot comment
Ugh. The amateur comedians are here. Keep that on Reddit.
Yes, there must be no humour on the fediverse.
OI THERE KONT? 'AVE YEW BEEN COMMITTIN' FUNNIES? IF SO, REPORT FOR EXTOIMINATION IMMEDIATELY!
Oh no I just went on Reddit and they banned me for being too funny 🫨
That annoys me, they lost because "might be AI" are you kidding me? The photo does not look AI to me at all. If the photo was edited through photoshop or went through an art program couldn't they have just asked for the original? That must've been infuriating.
Nothing about that looks like AI to me, beyond the uncanny valley feeling and the eerie lighting. The wallpaper and tile alone would be a big headache to get that consistent, especially with the mirror there. Same goes for the pattern on the clothes and the anatomy (hands, anyone?).
Just check the mirrors man, perfect likeness. I don't think any genai is there yet.
Also if it is real, surely they can just prove it by sharing where the picture is taken?
Edit: apparently it was taken at a Gucci exhibition. Surely that's enough info to double check?
guardian? Naa - probably bullshit.
Guardian is the only news outlet in the UK worth reading. But their quality has been on the decline.
The Guardian is the only mainstream centrist outlet we have left, everything else has lurched towards (or has always been on) the right-wing. And before anyone says the Guardian is a lefty paper, you only need to look at their coverage of the Labour party during the Corbyn years to know they would back the LibDems in a heartbeat if they weren't such a colossal joke.
Why?