Diners who order boneless chicken wings can't expect them to really be boneless, court rules
Diners who order boneless chicken wings can't expect them to really be boneless, court rules
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that chicken wings billed as "boneless" can actually include bones.
No bones about it
You're viewing a single thread.
What? If you have boneless anything on the menu it must be boneless!
Laughs in fish fillets.
Ok, but those bones can be eaten without problems (unless they are inhaled...)
Ohio is a problem and I'm done pretending it's not.
Same way if you call something a "wing" it has to be a wing? (I think this should be a thing but since that's not true the boneless part isn't)
Edit: I said that badly, let me rephrase (and this isn't my opinion I'm just trying to decode the logic): Because "Boneless Wing" already isnt technically true to what the product is (it's not a wing), then the other part doesn't have to be technically true (it's not always bonless).
Now if someone sold, a boneless steak with a bone, then under this logic it would not be allowed.
I mean i would be fine with some spicy nuggets instead (just put the same flavor on and you have boneless chicken something, just need to find a nice name for it and done, ready for the menu).