You're viewing part of a thread.
LOL no fuckin way you ever learned "quite a lot of them" (not even a logical response/conclusion following the comment) and then "forgot" everything about functional programming, but randomly spouted it out because you thought it was somehow relevant. You don't know what you're talking about at all and it shows. And you're crying "other people think they're intelligent"... do you have no self-awareness? How do you rationalize that you get a pass for saying and believing stupid shit, "I know I'm right and they're wrong, science and logic says otherwise but I know that means logic is just liberal propoganda! Grrr!"
Let me guess, you coded a shitty notepad in Python one time or vaguely heard some people on r/ProgrammerHumor mention C++ pointers and Haskell and think you're a "master hacker" now. Lmao
Well, I didn't see which exact insult you wrote to be deleted by mods (I value their support emotionally, but frankly would prefer to replace all "deleted by mod" cases with "hidden by mod" to see what's been posted if I want), but laziness in functional programming is not limited to lazy iterators. I meant lazy evaluations, as in Lisp. If that still doesn't make sense to you, please postpone answering by 8-10 hours.
EDIT: Ah, I see it now. A fool indeed.
Actually whatever lemmy.world admins use to auto-ban malfunctioned and was banning a bunch of users for "URL Blacklist" coincidentally when I posted the comment. I'm glad that you thought it was a long ban though and that I wouldn't be able to respond because now I can point and laugh at what you just said
but laziness in functional programming is not limited to lazy iterators. I meant lazy evaluations, as in Lisp.
Man you really just fucking Googled "laziness programming definition" and regurgitated words from the first Wikipedia article you saw? I'm curious how you're going to try to weasel your way of of that and somehow connect lazy evaluation to however you were responding to that person. Because if you actually knew what the hell lazy evaluation was then you would know how stupid you sound right now. Let me guess, you won't even attempt to because you realize trying to explain would make you look even more clueless.
What is obvious is that you saw the words "functional programming" online one time and thought "you should learn functional programming" sounded like a fancy way of saying "you should learn logic" so you used it without having a clue as to what you were even talking about. The most stereotypical ancap pseudo-intellectualism I've seen!
Man you really just fucking Googled “laziness programming definition” and regurgitated words from the first Wikipedia article you saw?
In my language what I said looked fine in this context and I'd be understood. In your language it's still fine because a person arguing in good faith starts with assuming that the problem is with them, and the rest are not worth worries.
Since I well know what lazy evaluations are, I am using them correctly, for the analogy that another person should have separated two arguments I've made (EDIT: as in "evaluating one is not necessary to evaluate another referring to it").
So it is clear for any spectator, competent or not, that you are a fool. Except some of them are the same.(EDIT2: removed for pettiness as well, found mentions of ADHD and, well, ADHD people usually seek arguments not to humiliate others, so I'm changing my interpretation)I didn't "think it was a long ban", I thought the specific comment got removed for some reason and I asked you to postpone continuation for 8-10 hours because I'd rather not test my willpower to not argue with fools in that timespan.
I also think you are incompetent at your job, because people use informal language all the time to talk about concepts. (EDIT: this is petty, removed)In my language what I said looked fine in this context and I'd be understood.
Haha no fucking way you're trying to use "in my language it's different" in this context. What language? What language could you possibly even be referring to? Is this language in the room with us right now?
Since I well know what lazy evaluations are, I am using them correctly, for the analogy that another person should have separated two arguments I've made. So it is clear for any spectator, competent or not, that you are a fool. Except some of them are the same.
You saying "I'm right and your wrong because... because I know I'm right!" is certainly an argument. I guess I was correct about you not being able to come up with actual reasoning for the bullshit you tried pulling.
I also think you are incompetent at your job, because people use informal language all the time to talk about concepts.
What kind of pseudointellectual oral diarrhea is this? "Informal language"? You think anyone actually believes the bullshit you're making up about "lazy evaluation" being "informal language" for something else in your language?
Are you in 10th grade or something? You sound so unbelievably dumb right now trying to make justifications for your stupidity up on the fly and failing horribly.