what if, right, what if our super-duper-autocomplete was just tricking us so it could TAKE OVER ZEE VORLD AHAHAHAHAHAHA! that'd be wild, hey
what if, right, what if our super-duper-autocomplete was just tricking us so it could TAKE OVER ZEE VORLD AHAHAHAHAHAHA! that'd be wild, hey
www.lesswrong.com New report: "Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?" — LessWrong
I examine the probability of a behavior sometimes called "deceptive alignment."
![New report: "Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?" — LessWrong](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7f63c20a-5a65-4077-8f95-8859ad38f799.png?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
You're viewing a single thread.
All Comments
32 comments
I conclude that scheming is a disturbingly plausible outcome of using baseline machine learning methods to train goal-directed AIs sophisticated enough to scheme (my subjective probability on such an outcome, given these conditions, is ~25%).
Out: vibes and guesswork
In: "subjective probability"
30 0 Replyat one of the places i worked this kind of data was called assnumbers.
24 0 Reply
32 comments
Scroll to top