You're viewing a single thread.
14 comments
Just here to rep my man Vlad and say his videos are really stellar
How can you claim that a negative is obvious if, to express it, you need to acknowledge its positive axiomatically to have something to subject to negation? Doesn't the very act of positing such a claim make it less obvious than if it were simply left unsaid?
What
Don't play innocent, it's you who's claiming to obviously not be a banana. I'm asking: Isn't that denial suspiciously specific?
14 comments