You know the reason why they're considering banning TikTok?
Do you think it's to protect the people? Do you think it's because Social media is Toxic af? Well guess what...it's none of those things.
It's only because China passed laws saying that companies that operated there had to be owned by the Chinese. America just did a big fat "Nuh uh, you!" - that's all.
Your comment is just misinformation. The US government asked Tik Tok to sever it's ties to its parent company and they refused. This is also not anything new as other countries and government bodies including India, Australia, Canada, the UK, parts of the European Union, and New Zealand have banned the app from official devices due to security reasons.
That would be called the populum fallacy. Just because something is popular, doesn't make it right.
I notice none of you have actually provided any logical reasoning here that contradicted me, just reiterated the same "but others are doing it" stance.
Why is TikTok being banned? Because of 'surveillance"? Okay, then why isn't facebook and others? -- Oh because they're part of the same allied group who have an agreement to spy on each others citizens (five eyes).
It's basically saying "You're okay to spy on Americans if you're an 'American' company or at least one of the countries we're allied with"...
But, we're looking at a double-standard here. This is literally only being implemented because "ree china bad".
Give me some good arguments here, that...CANNOT...also be applied to American social media companies, and you'll have won this argument.
Multiple counties have been banning Chinese apps long before the current Gaza situation. Take off your horse blinders.
Edit. Nevermind, your just a troll. The other day your "opinion" of Israel was pretty damned glowing:.
I mean, they're ridding the world of a civilization which is intolerant to LGBT individuals, women, etc. So what's the problem? Not all human life is worth something. Not all cultures are worth preserving.
hahaha, what a redditor. You gotta dive through people's history looking for something 'incriminating' so you can attack the person instead of the argument at hand.
If they're banning an app because a nation wants to control the narrative, but you won't talk about that, because reeee China bad...but you can't articulate why "china bad".
Do you realize you're missing important context to that conversation, and all of my viewpoints align with each other perfectly? You know why? Because I'm not a hypocrite.
I'll give you another one of my quotes here, just so you understand my point of view on humanity:
Once you start viewing humanity the same way you'd view organisms in a Petri Dish, you'll have gotten it.
You're here for a purpose. I'm here to argue and observe the dataset.