Skip Navigation

Poignant post on the state of things

354
Benjamin, Get The Musket @lemmy.cafe pinkdrunkenelephants @lemmy.world

Poignant post on the state of things

60 2

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
354 comments
  • Do you think Capitalist owners can't just do their job and go home? Do you even think Capitalist Owners work?

    If Workers share ownership, they can hold electoral councils, elect a manager, or do any other form of decision making without requiring constant input.

    Do you actively participate in every company you own in your S&P 500 ETF?

    • Ooooooookaaaaayyyyy. You are more interested in feeling attacked and defending your ego than discussing praxis. I'm not interested in that.

      Also lmao thinking I own stock.

      • No, I'm not. I was genuinely asking questions here, I was not intending on being confrontational. I'm not even who you originally replied to.

        Even if you personally don't own stock, do you imagine everyone who owns a share of VOO makes decisions for every company in the S&P 500? That's my point, ownership isn't necessarily management, just entitlement to control and profit.

        If Workers collectively own a factory, they may choose to vote on how to produce, or vote on a manager. The point is leaving it to the Workers to decide, rather than a dictatorial owner, ie a Capitalist.

        • I'm not even who you originally replied to.

          Yes I noticed, which makes it even weirder that you are asking about my knowledge about capitalist systems and my personal opinions, which have zero relevance to the question.

          do you imagine everyone who owns a share of VOO makes decisions for every company in the S&P 500?

          I still have no idea what this has to do with a system where the workers own the means of production.

          • It is entirely relevant. By asking what a worker would do if they don't want to contribute to actively managing a company, you are demonstrating a lack of understanding how Capitalist systems function. You're implying Capitalist owners actively contribute and manage the companies they own. Owning stocks and thus a portion of companies doesn't mean you're an active manager, it just entitles you to voting power proportional to your ownership.

            If workers owned the Means of Production, then they collectively have voting power, but a worker that does not wish to use said voting power would act just as any other Capitalist that does not wish to exert their power would do: Collect profit and maintain their current power.

            • Collect profit and maintain their current power.

              XD my man... I knew you could do it! You just had to stop attacking your assumptions for 2 seconds!

              • Not sure what you're on about, haha. I've been entirely consistent, you've just avoided actually responding to me.

354 comments