What's a sci-fi or fantasy book or series that you want to see adapted as a movie/television series?
What's a sci-fi or fantasy book or series that you want to see adapted as a movie/television series?
I didn't read this series when I was a kid, but I finally got around to reading Roger Zelazny's Chronicles of Amber.
Given it's an older series, I wasn't sure how much I'd like it (some of those older series age horribly), but it was actually REALLY good still, and the few minor things that'd aged too much wouldn't be hard to update for a modern audience.
But the concept of Amber is fantastic, Corwin's behavior and arc perfect, and I think a TV series could do it justice nowadays. Man, some CGI artists could do some beautiful work depicting a hellride through shadow.
I also would really, really love to see Anne McCaffrey's Dragonriders of Pern adapted...but there's a few parts that have aged pretty badly, so it'd need careful handling of things like Lessa and F'lar's relationship and such. And maybe, you know, keep Jaxom the hell away from Corana.
But I think the whole idea of threadfall, and Impressing dragons, could be done beautifully on the screen. I think a run from Dragonflight to All The Weyrs of Pern (including the Harper Hall Trilogy) could be done. (Then leave the later books out, they don't really add much, lol.)
The series would need a top-notch composer scoring it, though. I'd vote for Natalie Holt. She did wonderfully with Loki, and it'd be a nice touch having a woman score the series that'd have the Harper Hall Trilogy included in it.
You're viewing a single thread.
Witcher without all the Netflix bullshit. Like, give it to someone who loves the IP, not someone who wants to push some agenda.
I've loved the book series for close to 20 years, it deserves a LOTR or GoT level movie/series.
I reckon you've been downvoted for the agenda comment, but you're absolutely right about it being bullshit. They fucking ruined it. Imo it's less about 'agenda' and more about the arrogance of the directing team.
Literally all they had to do was replicate the stories for the screen, but they couldn't resist putting 'their stamp on it'. What a missed open goal.
Don't really care, if people can't see that the director is pushing her agenda into the thing and kinda forgets about actually adapting the source material, it's their problem, not mine.
The Witcher books talk about a lot of issues that are relevant today (like racism, the price of being neutral, colonialism and many more), I personally also love the medieval politics bit (you can see that Sapkowski really loves history in those parts) and I think it deserves a proper adaptation, not this hacked together bullshit that just likes to push every modern agenda in there.
You (the general you) can dislike my opinion as much as you want, that's really up to you, but IMO one of those things lines pretending it works with societal issues, while the other one truly presents them as such.
I've never read the books, huge fan of the game series. I love reading, but what's put me off is Sapkowski's reputation for being an arsehole. I dunno, I've always been a bit resistant to consuming media if I don't like the creator.
Like, I can enjoy Michael Jackson songs, but if I discovered him today with all the baggage attached I might never have formed an attachment to his music. Think I'll see if I can find any Witcher books in the library and then if I don't enjoy, I've not wasted any money.
Well, he is an arsehole a bit, but not on the level I'd consider turning away from his books. I probably wouldn't want to be friends with him, but he's not such a big arsehole that I would lose sleep over supporting him financially. I truly recommend the books, though I've heard that the English translations leave a lot to be desired.
Ok I’ll bite. What’s Netflix’s agenda with the Witcher? Hmm?
Not Netflix's, the director's.
Edit: No need to "bite", if you want to argue with someone online, I'm afraid you'll have to find your fix somewhere else.