How do y'all deal with programs not supported on Linux?
How do y'all deal with programs not supported on Linux?
I've been seeing all these posts about Linux lately, and looking at them, I can honestly see the appeal. I'd love having so much autonomy over the OS I use, and customize it however I like, even having so many options to choose from when it comes to distros. The only thing holding me back, however, is incompatibility issues. A lot of programs I work with very often are Windows-exclusive, and alternatives supporting Linux are rare. So I guess I'm stuck with Windows, since I deem those particular programs really important.
Any advice from Linux nerds here? All constructive replies are very appreciated.
You're viewing a single thread.
Depends on the program.
- Games: Proton works well 99% of the time.
- Office: I use LibreOffice as much as possible. At work, I use the Web version of MS Office; it doesn't have all features of the desktop version but it's good enough for my use case.
- Media editing (music, image, video): GIMP, Krita, Kdenlive and Ardour are more than enough for my personal use.
In general, I would recommend trying the Linux alternative, and if it's not good enough, use a Windows VM or dual-boot. If you spend 90% of your time in Photoshop or any other professional software without a Linux version or feature-complete alternative, you should stay on Windows, and maybe use Linux only when you're not working.
I second this, OP, this is pretty much the state of it, but I do recommend trying out a Linux program called Wine, it can run some windows programs in your Linux environment. It's not always the best, but I run a circuit making program there and I only had a bit of issue once. I just wanted to mention wine since some stuff works well with it, but now I'm realizing a VM might be better if it's multiple programs lol. Oh well.
Which circuit maker?
LTspice
Have you compared kdenlive to shotcut? Wondering how they compare as I've been working with SC for a few months an dfinally getting used to it, but the lack of a titler feature is a glaring omission.