You're viewing a single thread.
372 comments
The presence of picture 1 in no way prevents the presence of picture 2.
It does if there's enough of them?
No the people who own pictire one can and have shown they are willing too let them sit and rot rather than lower rent
I don't think the suggestion in picture one is for profit apartments owned by landlords.
Let me know where I can find the homeless people tent encampments in the netherlands.
Public/social housing (presumably what's being proposed here) sure as hell would beat tent cities. Who the hell wants to stay in a tent rather than an actual home? Housing co-ops work if you've already got some amount of money, too.
I'm having trouble telling the difference between the two.
372 comments