Skip Navigation

Argentina's president bans gender-affirming care for people under age 18

apnews.com Argentina's president bans gender-affirming care for people under age 18

Argentina's president says he has banned gender-affirming care for people under age 18. A presidential spokesperson said Wednesday the government was repealing a 2012 gender identity law provision allowing such practices with parental or guardian consent.

Argentina's president bans gender-affirming care for people under age 18
118

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
118 comments
  • Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don't give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

    Which since talking to other people I leavened of CPP but that's literally health problems so it's deffrnrt.

    But, your making up stuff and trying to mold the arguem t so your right.

    Ans lastly cause you wanna add it in, yeah I am against circumcision. But keep changing the argument

    • Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don't give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

      RIP little Timmy, he could have lived with chemo but [email protected] doesn't want children to take drugs.

    • Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

      So no healthcare for children, got it. No operations for fat boys with moobs, no circumcisions and since you phrase it that way, guess no medication for any other illnesses either, huh? And the reason for this asinine take is the view that you think that children can simply go to a doctors and command them to give them full gender reassignments.

      Your ignorance has been the issue the whole time. You're afraid of a problem which doesn't exist and because of that you want to make life miserable for those you pretend you're looking out for. It's horrific, tbh.

      "Making up stuff." Name one.

      And now you're spamming typos on purpose to even further pretend like you never edited anything to add anything to your comment, despite there being "edit" and "edit edit" and several sentences with those. Who do you think you're lying to?

      • Making stuff up?

        you added 17 edits and made your arguemt 600% longer <--Lie your argument changed completely <-- Lie

        And I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There's no winnignwith you

        • No, it's not a lie. It's a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there's SEVERAL "edit" labels you've added to the original, which everyone can see.

          I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

          You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.

          You added several sentences. You didn't just "fix typos".

          I also fixed typos after proofreading. Takes a whole of twenty seconds as you can see.

          • No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.

            Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?

            • No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen.

              #No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

              Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.

              I added all my thoughts immediately.

              Not before I had already replied to you.

118 comments