Billionaire Anti-Aging Zealot Shares Data on Son’s Erections
Billionaire Anti-Aging Zealot Shares Data on Son’s Erections
The eccentric former tech CEO famous for his anti-aging efforts compared his nocturnal erections to his 19-year-old son’s.
You're viewing part of a thread.
He's helping himself by publishing the results for everyone? That doesn't even make sense.
You're being obtuse and and I question your intentions in have a good faith argument.
Multiple people have already told why that "data" is useless. Why are you defending this guy so hard?
Because he's trying to do something good. Why are you attacking him so hard?
Publicly giving out information about the erections of his 19-year-old son is doing something good?
You've got a lot of self reflection to do, friend.
I don't know about that but it's funny you focus only on that.
What about the sleep data, food data, exercise data?
You're only focusing on a small part of the research. Which makes me think you're buying have this discussion in good faith
We're in a post specifically about that, Einstein. Lol
And agian. Multiple people have already explained to you why his published data is useless. Read the words you're looking at.
I think that the food industry don't want you to be healthy and smear campaigns like this are attacking this guy
If you're referring to the gay couple who run my favorite chocolatiers, they're not smearing anything but fondant.
My advice to you: don't listen to the voices and get off the internet.
The ...gay food industry?
I don't even know where to begin digesting that one.Although saliva starts the digestion process, you have to swallow for it to finish.
Lol he edited out "the gay food industry" from the comment
Looks like that was a mistake and he removed the "gay" reference. Not sure what he actually intended to write, though.
You're assuming his actual intentions are what he declares them to be. Hey, maybe they are. But there's no way of knowing that.
But I try a lot of things and fail. So does everyone else. What matters is not his intention, but the quality of the results. And the way he's collecting and reporting his results is undisciplined and unscientific.
But you don't seem all that able to understand either science or the human character, so I'm going to cut my losses and stop trying to explain it to you. Maybe some day, when I'm bored, I'll come up with a doggy-doggy horsey-horsey version and try again.
He may think it helps others to publish his results. Or maybe it's just a publicity stunt. But neither of those motivations mean that the results will be worth a shit.
So without knowing any of the results, they're invalid? That makes no sense