If China becomes democratic, would you be okay with China replacing the US as a global superpower?
I mean like:
Chinese (Edit: Mandarin Chinese) will become the lingua franca of the world
The Internation Aviation Language will (probably) become Chinese (replacing Aviation English)
Lunar New year becomes a popular holiday (like Chrismas is currently popular worldwide)
The Internet will use mostly Chinese Chracter
And instead of 26 Latin based characters, you'll have to learn thousands of characters, imagine that 😅 (or just use a translator tool 🤷♂️)
There would be a China version of Hollywood, taking over the original Hollywood
Fengshui becomes a thing that the world starts to care about
UN Headquarters now located in Shanghai (I'm guessing this is the most "international" city in China, right?)
Boeing is dead, some Chinese airplane manufacturer now dominates, competing with Airbus.
Baidu is default search engine (now with less censorship due to democrarization)
Harmony OS (Huawei's Android fork) become the new "Apple", iPhone is now insignificant, ranking below Motorola in terms of market share.
Either Windows get brought by some Chinese Bussiness person, or there China makes a Linux distribution that starts off as Open Source with some proprietary components (like how Android is), then eventually becoming Closed Source once they overtake Windows. Lets call it PandaOS (I'm not creative with names 'mmkay)
I don't care which country is the global super power as long as it adhere to the liberal world order and all that comes with it.
I want to leave in peace, enjoy my human rights and not have to worry about other countries using arms to push their will.
But also: a lot of those points have nothing to do with who the global super power is
Appendix: maybe I was vague but my answer is that as long as the super power follows the rule-based order (as it is supposed to be obviously) it doesn't matter who that super power is. China, Russia, USA, Albania, the Vatican, Congo, w/e.
Understand that might does not make right and follow the same rules as the lesser states and I'm happy.
Hummm the “liberal world order” is 100% “countries” using arms to push their will. Countries being “the west”.
And YOU having “human rights” is not really dependent on the “liberal world order”. Most of your rights were won by blood and tears during the late 1800s and early 1900s, through popular movements mostly ideologically aligned first with anarchism then with communism.
Also, the vast majority of the world not having human rights and being colonized and exploited IS your “liberal world order”.
So not really sure how you specifically benefit from western imperialism, unless you are a billionaire ofc. Which I highly doubt.
And YOU having “human rights” is not really dependent on the “liberal world order”. Most of your rights were won by blood and tears during the late 1800s and early 1900s, through popular movements mostly ideologically aligned first with anarchism then with communism.
You are correct in that the liberal world order is an effect of previous hardwon freedoms. What is your point? The LIO makes sure that if my government tries to take these freedoms from me it invokes international support. So a malicious government will not only have to deal with domestic pushback, but international as well.
Also, the vast majority of the world not having human rights and being colonized and exploited IS your “liberal world order”.
..which is why these countries are under sanctions for example. Take Venezuela as a case.
But yes, the postcolonial debate is ongoing.
I don't care.
The question was if I was okay with China as the super power and my answer is that it don't matter as long as it adheres to the liberal world order.