Apple's Activation Lock for iPhone components will make a huge dent in the market for stolen iPhones, though it introduces another barrier to DIY repairs (Ben Lovejoy/9to5Mac)
Apple's Activation Lock for iPhone components will make a huge dent in the market for stolen iPhones, though it introduces another barrier to DIY repairs (Ben Lovejoy/9to5Mac)
By Ben Lovejoy / 9to5Mac. View the full context on Techmeme.
Ben Lovejoy / 9to5Mac: Apple's Activation Lock for iPhone components will make a huge dent in the market for stolen iPhones, though it introduces another barrier to DIY repairs — Apple's latest theft-prevention measure went live for beta testers yesterday: Activation Lock for iPhone components.
You're viewing a single thread.
What's the barrier to DIY repair?
It is because people can't buy stolen parts anymore?
Third-party parts: You are limited to parts acknowledged by apple. They will be more expensive for no reason and you will therefore be less inclined to repair your own device.
Artificial rarity:
They will be more rare and therefore you will be less inclined to repair.Rare and overworked repair centers:
There will be a limited selection of repair stores, potentially entirely limited to the "genius bars" because of hurdles apple puts out and therefore you will be less inclined to repair.Also additional point-of-failure:
Phones fail more often because every single part now has additional complexity.On the other side the additional security against stealing:
Assumed, until a pairing software is stolen from an apple store, until people figure out how to read and fake this, or until people find ways to circumvent this in an unforeseen way.That is some seriously gish gallop. Nothing you've said is based on reality.
Do you want to go into any kind of detail?
It reads a lot like an LLM. I think it could be re-written into a cohesive flowing argument rather than disparate bullet points.
You think the other guy's critique of my comment being "not based in reality" while giving not the slightest clue about their own thinking is because the bullet point style makes it look like an LLM?
The bullet points make the multiple arguments easily seperatable in case of discussions, so I like them. They stay.
You don't have to edit your message, nobody is suggesting that. It is, however, terse and unclear.
I really like the book "Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace" by Williams [^1], you should check it out if you have time. It has a lot of good advice that is easy to apply.
See Also Elements of Style by EB White [^2].
[^1]: ISBN: 0-321-89868-0
Do you mean "The Elements Of Style" by William Strunk Jr? The style guide for formal grammar from 1959 (newest version from 2005)? If not, do you have an IBAN for me?
Sorry I got my wires crossed with a similar book of the same name.
I've edited my above comment to be clearer, I mean this one:
0-321-89868-0
I'll look into it, thanks!
In the past, Apple has locked components to the phone by requiring proprietary pairing software to enable the use of these parts that only Apple technicians can access. This means that Apple gets a cut of any repairs and prevents you from doing repairs on your own for some components.
Ok and this specific change adds to that in what way?
Now the parts need additional registration at apple at the time of the pairing, I assume.