I agree, about as insignificant as you can get. However, I think it would be eligible for a purple heart if it happened in a war.
This is what the marines say:
Eligibility for a Purple Heart applies to service members who suffered a wound: 1) As the direct or indirect result of enemy action, and 2) The wound required treatment by a medical officer at the time of the injury.
Because medical officers are usually pretty much doctor level in the army I was in, and before them there's your own medkit, and then there's the medics who aren't technically officers either.
If it's just "required treatment" essentially then yeah but if it's "treatment by a medical officer", then I don't think this would qualify.
that presumes Trump isn't a draft-dodging bastard of a person. If he had been a conscientious-objector of the Vietnam "war," he would maybe have some genuine merit to his words.
Instead he's a (publicly known) selfish draft-dodger who only did it so he wouldn't get shot like the crybaby that got his ear pierced a couple weeks ago.
If you show me a Vietnam veteran that votes for Trump, I'll show you a brainwashed power tool.
I am talking about where he was shot. I'd rather be shot in about a dozen other places than one inch away from instant death, I don't know why that's a controversial take.