Which is exactly what i've argued a hundred times.
I genuinely would not be surprised if half of these are being made by trolls for the explicit purpose of muddying the waters and confusing things to give cover/plausible deniability to what he actually says, since screenshotted tweets have apparently become a medium of information transmission.
Very true. Mentioned this elsewhere someone suggestion a large watermark:
I went a different route, though I avoided placing the callout somewhere it may be accidentally cropped.
I hope the, uh, non-disinformation can have a simple start here, and if weβre big enough some day that kind of thing is a problem maybe we re-adjust. Of course, nothing stopping someone from recreating something to their less-scrupulous heartβs delight. (in the case someone is re-creating something to intentionally mislead, not re-creating based on their expectations of peopleβs knowledge and BS meters)
Ahh just canβt wait for the proliferation of high-quality generated videosβ¦
Iβd like to apologise now for when, in the future, I place a βparodyβ sticker on a genuine social media post.
I know, thereβs something wrong with meβ¦ but I thought Iβd give you a heads-up about it as you seem pretty reasonable.
I was thinking of some (gentle) lazy flaming or trolling but your mention of instigating international conflict has inspired me to better myself and aim higher in life. Thank you.
I went a different route, though I avoided placing the callout somewhere it may be accidentally cropped.
I hope the, uh, non-disinformation can have a simple start here, and if weβre big enough some day that kind of thing is a problem maybe we re-adjust. Of course, nothing stopping someone from recreating something to their less-scrupulous heartβs delight. (in the case someone is re-creating something to intentionally mislead, not re-creating based on their expectations of peopleβs knowledge and BS meters)
Ahh just canβt wait for the proliferation of high-quality generated videosβ¦