You're viewing part of a thread.
I don't think the license does anything at all, but it is weird to me that you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID. How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so? If you had a unique phrase you could probably trigger the model into repeating it as evidence.
I don’t think the license does anything at all
ProPublica would disagree with you.
you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID
The specific license number is explicitly stated.
How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so?
Already discussed in that other conversation post.
You are writing "anti-commercial AI," they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially. You have completely different motivations. One major difference between you and ProPublica is they must have interacted with some actual lawyers explaining how copyright works.
You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.
That's just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.
It's actually not even my description, it's one I got from someone else, who's also licensing their content with the same license.
I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.
You have completely different motivations.
No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.
"Your license doesn't do what you say it does."
"Haha, joke's on you, I don't want it to do what I say it does."
Glad we figured that one out.
“Your license doesn’t do what you say it does.”
“Haha, joke’s on you, I don’t want it to do what I say it does.”
Glad we figured that one out.
Whatever lets you sleep at night.