The firm has not commented on the possibility of customer data exposure yet, presumably because the investigation is still in its early phase.

Not Mastodon, but mastodon.social. All the journalist on news focused instances are excluded.

Any countries want to stop all funding until claims can be investigated, or do they prefer to stick to their double standards?

Probably one of the best sci-fi shows created in the last few decades. It’s smart, deep, and engaging. You might need to get through a few first episodes if high school drama is not your jam, but after that you will be hooked.

All of them are considered in tandem, not individually.

Considering that OpenAI is making a commercial profit from developing its ML models

They are losing money during development (all those GPUs are not free and running them costs a lot of energy), they are making the money after it's trained. Just factual inaccuracy.

And being used for commercial purpose is not automatic rejection. Take YouTube, where fair use comes up constantly. Almost all the cases are for commercial purpose, but most qualify under fair use.

#3 also because the model usually ingests the entire work, not just part of it.

While they are trained on full works, the used work in the result is different. Probably minimal considering the size of the models. The fact that some courts already ruled that "AI" works can't be copyrighted gives weight to the argument that it's a unique work.

It's very hard to argue that "AI" generated is different from someone looking at the original and making a copy by hand. And since the latter is allowed, by the same token is the former.

Which is both sad and confusing as he pulled it out on set with the intention to pull the trigger for the scene.

It wasn't even an actual scene being filmed, It was blocking (working out the details of an actor’s moves in relation to the camera) where non-functioning props like cardboard are usually used. The scene script in question also didn't even have him pointing the gun. He was supposed to only draw the gun out partially.

They were one of the first to go.

I think my workplace would be more concerned about the fact that their own sex toy shopping is tracked than the fact that I use sex toys.

But I marked it as NSFW anyway.

Which part do you find NSFW?

At this point, it’s unclear what’s the extent of the incident and how many HubSpot customers were affected.

While TeamViewer states there is no evidence that its product environment or customer data has been breached, its massive use in both consumer and corporate environments makes any breach a significant concern as it would provide full access to internal networks.

Both things can be true. And in this case they are.

Checkout coffeezilla/voidzilla coverage if you haven't seen it yet.

Fucking pay them or write them yourselves.

This. Refactoring the whole code is insanely time intensive, even if developers know multiple languages. All these critical components you rely on, you use without any compensation or support and then dare to complain it's not to your security standards. Fix it, or pay for it to be fixed.

Follow up story to https://lemmy.zip/post/18016094

It really depends on each person's threat model. But there are a few things everyone would benefit from. Like VPN, email aliasing, password manager, 2FA/MFA. They don't have any convenience cost and in most cases make your life easier.

If you are interested in learning more:

• https://www.privacyguides.org
• https://thenewoil.org/en/guides/prologue/
• https://freedom.press/training/
• https://anonymousplanet.org/guide.html

There is also Vivaldi (based on Chromium/Blink) which is employee owned, but the choices are shrinking.

Mozilla Foundation is still non-profit, but Mozilla Corporation is not. And while they claim to operate by Mozilla Manifesto, it's non-binding and has been broken multiple times. Remember Pocket and their promise to open source it?

Firefox own data disproves your statement. https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity

I know there are strong feelings about posts that include Threads and to lesser extent Bluesky, but it's important to know what corporate media thinks of Fediverse and how they compare it to corporate alternatives. You are encouraged to dissect the article and point out all of its failures, or just downvote the post and move on. But I won't be removing it.

P.S. The author of the article definitely has a pro VC stance.

[email protected], created not long ago, exactly due to similar reasons.