You're viewing a single thread.
Not sure why this is so downvoted , it's an interesting question.
There are many things that made us shoot forward in the evolutionary arm race, but one the parts is the sharing of knowledge and values to our offspring.
Children want to learn from their parents, and parents want to teach their children in the same way they learnt from their parents.
The early humans who started this generational knowledge sharing fared better, and humans became more social and dependent on each other, while the humans focused on themselves more than their offspring perished.
It's in our nature to care for our next generation, in the same way the previous generation cared for us.
Not sure why this is so downvoted
My guess is because it's kind of an asshole sentiment and not a useful post on any way.
Until you notice that it's posted in nostupidquestions and actually is on topic.
Monke want hug
Monke give hug, monke get hug
Monke no give. only take.
That's fine, it's the group that makes giving worthwhile not necessarily each individual. There will always be those who only take, and some who seem to only give. Build things because there is a chance that you will benefit by how others extend it before you die if that makes it seem better, but we usually benefit by progress and the chance of guessing which progress it will be it's almost always wrong.
Monke strong.. together?
Yes, monke strong together. Good monke.