Intel admits Core Ultra 9 285K will be slower than i9-14900K in gaming
Intel admits Core Ultra 9 285K will be slower than i9-14900K in gaming
You're viewing a single thread.
5 comments
By 3 frames per second at over 260 fps for a savings of 80 watts.
Spend your watts on a better graphics card babe.
To be honest, I don't think that's too bad of a trade-off, but I can see how this would be controversial in the context of desktop computing.
it's bizarre how IHVs will absolutely crank power for such marnigal gains in average fps :(
I'm happy ARL is taking this approach.