The New York Times on Ukraine’s neofascist imagery: It’s ‘complicated’
The New York Times on Ukraine’s neofascist imagery: It’s ‘complicated’
US journalists have decided that being on the right team in this war is more important than presenting an accurate picture of events.
At issue was “the Ukrainian military’s complicated relationship with Nazi imagery, a relationship forged under both Soviet and German occupation during World War II.” The relationship is “delicate,” the Times says, because of Putin’s stated war aims of de-Nazification.
[…]
The relentless threat of being labeled “Putin apologists” has created a chilling effect at even the highest liberal establishment organizations. Per the Times:
Even Jewish groups and anti-hate organizations that have traditionally called out hateful symbols have stayed largely silent. Privately, some leaders have worried about being seen as embracing Russian propaganda talking points.
The Times story acknowledged that journalists are worried about reporting reality, noting that at one point, according to a Ukrainian press officer, journalists from an unnamed outlet had soldiers remove Nazi symbols before they were photographed. This is a serious allegation of journalists knowingly distorting their portrayal of reality for explicitly political reasons.
(Emphasis original.)
You're viewing a single thread.
Liberals demonstrate incredible amounts of cognitive dissonance. They appear to have deep concerns about the rise of far right in US while at the same time giving their full support to literal fascists in Ukraine. I guess if these people had any shred of integrity they wouldn't liberals in the first place.