Which ways are preferred for moderation to be handed off on sites like Lemmy (link aggregators/forums)?
Which ways are preferred for moderation to be handed off on sites like Lemmy (link aggregators/forums)?
You're viewing a single thread.
Has anyone tried making a spinning wheel of people associated with communities looking to change moderators and letting it determine who takes on the responsibilities?
On jlai.lu we make a thread in our metal community, and ask people if they'd like to take over, we're not big enough to warrant a proper system i think
Hey there, I'd like to provide insight, but I'm not sure exactly what you are meaning.
Would saying it a little more bluntly I guess ?
EDIT
I just pasted what you asked into AI for clarity is this right?
The user is seeking insights or suggestions on how moderation responsibilities are typically handed off on websites that function as link aggregators and forums, specifically mentioning Lemmy as an example. They also propose an idea, asking if anyone has tried using a spinning wheel to randomly select new moderators from a pool of individuals associated with the communities where moderator changes are needed. The spinning wheel concept is a creative way to determine new moderators in a more random and potentially fair manner.