Linux @lemmy.ml Bunny19 @lemmy.world 2mo ago

Linux middle ground?

so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

146

You're viewing a single thread.

146 comments

What's wrong with Ubuntu/Mint/PopOS/Fedora or any of the distros usually recommended? They're easier to maintain and more up to date than Debian
- I wouldn't call them up to date but they are a little newer than Debian with the exception of Pop OS.
  
  wouldn't call them up to date
  
  they are a little newer
  
  Huh
  
  What is confusing? It is newer than Debian but still fairly out of date compared to Fedora or the latest Ubuntu release

146 comments