You're viewing part of a thread.
It seems it is the secret ballot one that is conflict with the earlier quote. Do we know if they follow that principle, that their elections are what they say?
You can't beg the question like this and blame it on laziness. You're a deliberate bad faith actor.
Who can we believe? The constitution that defines how that government works or a completely unattributed claim?
I mean the US constitution has lots of fancy stuff in it that I'm not sure I take to be so in reality. So I'd definitely prefer if we had some sort of confirmation.
So if we don't have confirmation is not true? But the article on wikipedia without confirmation must be true because is on the internet?
Why you doubt only what is not constructed in your mind?
So if we don’t have confirmation is not true?
No, it's just unconfirmed
But the article on wikipedia without confirmation must be true because is on the internet?
The constitution was online too though.
Why you doubt only what is not constructed in your mind?
I don't know what you mean, could you rephrase this one?
The constitution was online too though.
Published by an american university.
I just meant that if I was believing/disbelieving stuff just because it was online then I would've treated them the same, since both were online