You're viewing part of a thread.
For the 5000th time, no, I didn’t say that.
You clearly implied it when you said that "If reproduction really mattered, gay people wouldn’t exist." And how in the world did you do this 5000x in one post? Does you're level of dishonesty know no bounds? lol
But if reproduction matters at all then my point stands. You seem to recognize that it does.
Does this mean bees disprove the theory of evolution like you claim?
I never made any such claim. I said reproduction was the foundation of Evolution. That's it. You just need it to be something else because you realize what a damning point this is for your ridiculous position.
Emotional and verbal abuse, including spewing rhetoric that leads to physical abuse, are all harmful actions.
You've been accusing me of being a narcissist almost from the start. To whine about "verbal abuse" after being verbally abusive yourself is, well, perfectly within the common behavior of an actual narcissist.
That’s no longer a thought.
Wait. . .are you saying that writing my thoughts out are the equivalent of actions on that thought? This gets better and better. Please don't leave now. I can't get enough of this.
Can you define "hyperbole?"
Look at how many times I've written "I never stated/said that." A boring amount.
Yes, if reproduction really mattered [to sexual arousal as I stated in the previous sentences], then gay people wouldn't exist because most gay people cannot reproduce with their partners. Yet find their partner sexually arousing. Fertile asexual people wouldn't exist. Like reproduction doesn't factor into sexual attraction and arousal because there's no way to know if someone is actually fertile with you and plenty of people are sexually aroused without reproducing. It's a kink. I could not be more clear.
Here's what I actually stated:
Reproduction has nothing to do with sexual arousal in people, unless they have a reproduction kink. It is not “normal” to hinge your arousal on reproduction. Ancient humans likely had no idea sex acts lead to babies. Their arousal was hinged on other things, kinda like most animals. Do you think stallions know they will have a baby when they breed a mare? Probably not. Reproduction is again, a kink. Which I have informed you repeatedly. That it’s been normalized by the groups you roll in, is a you thing.
We do not know if another organism can reproduce with us or not, until we go to reprodice with them over time. Many cishet couples are infertile despite being very attracted to each other and thinking the other person was fertile. You can’t know by looking. If reproduction really mattered, gay people wouldn’t exist. There would be no infertility. People would automatically have sex according to reproduction. They don’t. There’s your evidence. That we’ve evolved to reproduce is different than what actually compels sexual arousal.
So it's natural to have an evolution kink? Or an electron kink? Because sexual arousal depends on scientific phenomenon we cannot observe or are even aware of?
Yes, typing is an action. Is this news to you? Writing something down is not a thought. Thoughts happen in your head. They aren't thoughts any more when you say them, write them, sing them, etc. That's why you can be arrested for threats. That's why you are held to the terms of contracts. Lol.
It's also funny how manipulative you're trying to be here. It's really clear who is the abusive, narcissistic one. It's clear with every sentence you type. There's no hiding that. It doesn't really stick the same on me.
Can you define “hyperbole?”
Can you define "lying?"
Yes, if reproduction really mattered [to sexual arousal as I stated in the previous sentences], then gay people wouldn’t exist because most gay people cannot reproduce with their partners.
So, you know better than evolutionary scientists. You keep trying to have it both ways, but that's not how it works.
Yes, typing is an action.
No, I understand that. But expressing my thoughts is not the same as acting on them.
They aren’t thoughts any more when you say them, write them, sing them, etc.
No, they literally are still thoughts if you do any of those things*, just "expressed thoughts."
*exception if the thought is to express your thoughts, then it is the action on those thoughts.
It’s really clear who is the abusive, narcissistic one.
Agreed, its clear that it is the one who started attacking the other person first by calling them narcissistic, making up their positions, lying about what they said, and the one who thinks they know more than modern psychologists and evolutionary scientists.
It doesn’t really stick the same on me.
Agreed, it doesn't. It actually sticks on you. Not that you will accept it. It's always the other person's fault to a narcissist.
Lol you didn't think 5000 was hyperbolic enough?
I referenced evolutionary scientists.
You're really doing some backbending over "thoughts" and "expressed thoughts" lol. The expression is an action. The action is harmful because what you're saying is incorrect and advocates for a culture of being attracted to minors as a "norm" or "natural" state when that's not true. Thus encouraging others on Lemmy to adopt this philosophy and also be attracted to kids. This endangers kids. This is bad.
Lol I accept you think I'm a narcissist and abusive because I hurt your feelings. I can agree to disagree there. Can you?
you didn’t think 5000 was hyperbolic enough?
Nah just a lie because you had said it once.
I referenced evolutionary scientists.
Lol which one that said reproduction doesn't really matter? And where did they say this?
You’re really doing some backbending over “thoughts” and “expressed thoughts”
You really think expressing your thoughts is the same as acting on them? If you think you want to punch person a, you share this thought with person b, you think that's the same as actually punching person a?6
Thus encouraging others on Lemmy to adopt this philosophy and also be attracted to kids
Noone is encouraging anyone to be attracted to anyone. The only one attempting to dictate who people should be attracted to is you, by saying it's unnatural to have a perfectly natural attraction.
I hurt your feelings.
Wait, you think you've hurt my feelings? It's actually the opposite. I've quite enjoyed watching your delusion and narcissism on full display. There is zero about your insanity that I take personally insulting. It's more entertaining.
Although, I feel a little bad for you that you're this delusional. I'm not even sure how you function in real life.
I accept you think that way. I disagree.
Good for you. Doesn't change all your lying and narcissism.
I accept you think that way. I disagree.
Good for you in giving up defending a losing position. Better to just walk away then repeat this stupid line.
Like watch, I know I can't beat you if you keep repeating this over and over again, so I'll just leave.
Typically narcissists have a hard time agreeing to disagree. Which one of us struggles with that?
Have a good one. I accept you think the way you do. I disagree.